logo

43 pages 1 hour read

This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen

Fiction | Short Story Collection | Adult | Published in 1946

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Banality of Evil

Jewish German theorist Hannah Arendt famously coined the phrase “the banality of evil” to describe the behavior of Adolf Eichmann, one of the major powers behind the Holocaust, at his trial. Eichmann claimed that he took part in perpetrating violence because he was following orders and obeying the law. The phrase refers to the way extraordinary acts of evil are perpetrated by ordinary people. In This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen, Tadek observes the way average people, even his fellow inmates, become cruel when they are given power and have their cruelty enforced by others. In the title story, for instance, Henri is an average prisoner who is unaffected when taking part in the mass murder of the Jews who arrive in the freight cars—even when he sees people who were his friends in France. Tadek experiences how working on the train detail, even for a day, makes him feel angry and cruel.

In “Those Who Walked On,” Tadek sees and hears the constant stream of people who are escorted off the train and forced to walk either toward the gas chambers or to the camp. They walk day and night, the trains backed up at the ramp and waiting to unload. The selection, which is a much-feared surprise in “A Day at Harmenz,” becomes a regular event. In “Auschwitz, Our Home (A Letter),” Tadek meets a friend, Abbie, whom he has not seen in some time. Abbie describes how he has innovated a way of burning people more effectively by using children as kindling, as if he is simply doing a job. Evil and death become an everyday occurrence in the camps. Tadek is rarely roused to feel outrage because death is simply another aspect of life in the camp. After the war, Tadek believes that selfishness and disregard for human life is simply a part of human nature.

Tadek befriends Witek in “Auschwitz, Our Home (A Letter),” and Witek tells him of a prison guard who took pleasure in brutality, much like the pleasure that those in power in the camps take in torturing and killing inmates. Witek considers the desire to cause suffering in others to be against human nature as it has evolved, and Tadek thinks of Witek as a genetic anomaly because he is the type of person to fight and kill so that there will be no more killing of innocent people. Tadek notes that in Auschwitz, there are diversions and touches of high culture that distract from the evil that occurs there. Additionally, he points out that the people outside of the camp are aware of the conditions, but they don’t bother to speak out or fight, showing that evil is not only perpetrated but permitted.

The Fine Line Between Revenge and Justice

In “The People Who Walked On,” Tadek meets a Block Elder in the women’s camp who asks if he believes that there will ever be justice for the atrocities of the camp. Tadek replies that people will only feel that there has been justice when they enact the same cruelties on those who committed acts of violence. In the different stories, people express different ideas of justice, whether legal or exacted by the universe, and the question of whether justice will be served is one that hangs over the people who are incarcerated in the camp. Because the violence in the concentration camps was state-sponsored and legal, it was complicated to exact official justice against those who were following orders, particularly given the sheer magnitude in terms of numbers of people who participated in the violence and killing.

The American soldier in “Silence” promises the camp prisoners that those responsible for the atrocities committed would be subjected to justice and tells them not to seek justice on their own. However, the stories of incarceration show a prevailing injustice that is only countered occasionally by acts of justice exacted by either fate or other inmates. In “A Day at Harmenz,” Tadek tells Becker that he hopes that he will be selected for the gas chamber because Becker had other inmates killed or put to death at his last camp, including his own son. When Becker is selected that evening, it seems like a retribution by fate. Similarly, when First Sergeant Schillinger (“The Death of Schillinger”) is shot and killed by a woman prisoner whom he intends to rape, it appears to be another act of justice from the universe.

These moments of justice are far outweighed by the injustices of millions of innocent deaths. At the end of “The Death of Schillinger,” Tadek describes how the man who told him about Schillinger’s manner of death, the foreman of the crematorium, would eventually die with the other crematorium workers while trying to rise up after learning that they were slated to be killed. Not only were innocent people executed en masse, but those who survived in the camps were forced to hurt and kill each other, even resorting to cannibalism in their desperation. In “The January Offensive,” Tadek argues that “the ideals of freedom, justice and human dignity had all slid off man like a rotten rag” (168). At the end of “Silence,” the inmates wait for the American soldier to leave and then kill a Nazi with their bare hands. Legal justice is designed to be humane and affords the perpetrator human rights. It can take years or never happen at all. These stories show that there is a fine line between revenge and justice, and that it is difficult to have faith in the justice of a system that allowed such injustices to be perpetrated in the first place. 

Witnessing and Storytelling

When Tadek writes to his girlfriend in “Auschwitz, Our Home (A Letter),” he tells her to pay attention to what happens around them, because if they survive, it may become their duty to become witnesses for those who died. The stories in this collection bear witness to death and violence. Witnessing cannot bring back the dead, but it can serve to remember those who died. In the camps, prisoners were not only tortured and killed, but they were stripped of their individuality and erased. They were tattooed with a number to replace their names and identities. Their heads were shaved, and they were dressed in the same striped uniform. In death, they were burned or buried in mass graves. Victims were forced into anonymity. Therefore, witnessing and remembering are acts that, in a small way, counteract this erasure. Even while he is incarcerated, Tadek’s letters serve as a physical archive of what happened and what he saw.

Kapo Kwasniak in “A True Story” demands that Tadek tell him stories of what he has experienced and witnessed in his life. Although Tadek mostly tells stories from before the war, he tells Kwasniak about Zbigniew Namokel, having witnessed the beginning of the boy’s incarceration and his desperation to be seen as a non-Jewish person. Kwasniak replies that he witnessed Namokel’s death of typhus, which happened on the same mattress that Tadek occupies. By naming Namokel and remembering his death, Kwasniak saves him from anonymity, and Borowski memorializes him by publishing a story about him. This fear of erasure stands alongside the fear of pain and death in the camp. For instance, in “Auschwitz, Our Home (A Letter),” the camp bigwig begs Tadek to find a way to cremate him separately instead of anonymously with other bodies. In “A Visit,” Tadek remembers those who were sent to the crematoria from the hospital who pleaded with the orderlies to remember them and tell their stories. As a witness, Tadek sees himself as an observer rather than someone who was also incarcerated. He has difficulty witnessing his own personal emotional experience, and instead speaks in a mostly detached voice about the experiences of others. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 43 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools