logo

64 pages 2 hours read

Pygmalion

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1913

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Themes

Formal Education and Multiple Intelligences

Shaw differentiates between formal education and multiple forms of natural intelligence throughout the play. He associates formal education with the upper classes. Both Higgins and Pickering are academics who have studied linguistics and phonetics. Higgins displays his academic brilliance in the first act when he accurately identifies the dialects of those around him. For example, based on his training in dialectology, he “promptly” (Act I, Page 19) pinpoints a sarcastic bystander as coming from Hoxton. Pickering is star-struck upon meeting him, revealing that Higgins is a recognized and esteemed scholar. Higgins approaches the bet that Pickering proposes with the precision of a scientist conducting an experiment, coldly regarding Eliza as if she were another laboratory tool rather than a human being whose life will be impacted by his reworking of her speech and image. He successfully taught Nepommuck and others proper English and views this as evidence of his skill and worth.

Despite his formal education, Higgins lacks other sorts of intelligence. While he pinpoints people’s origins and social class through an orderly scientific analysis of their speech, Eliza and Doolittle far surpass him in their ability to recognize other people’s motives and character. Eliza is a quick learner and an apt performer. Using her skills in mimicking others’ behavior and speech, she handily wins the bet and convinces those who are of a higher social class than she that she belongs to their social sector. Her interactions with Pickering on the portico, her performance of the role of an upper-class lady at the ball, and her manipulation of Higgins’s feelings in their argument demonstrate her social and emotional intelligence, qualities that Higgins lacks. Likewise, her father uses rhetoric to great effect, even if his argument is coarse. Like the formally educated Higgins, Doolittle identifies and criticizes middle-class morality, manipulating it to his own advantage before his newfound financial resources force him to comply with its norms. Mrs. Higgins also has a social intelligence that Higgins lacks; in fact, she prefers that her son not visit when she receives guests because he is so socially inept. Despite his protestations that others don’t mind his lack of small talk, his mother recognizes the extent to which his faux pas damage the family’s image because adhering to social expectations is at the core of maintaining social esteem in the Victorian context. She facilitates the play’s partial resolution. Higgins’s education only partially contributes to the bet’s success and, Shaw suggests, other sorts of intelligence are necessary for true and convincing transformation to take place.

In addition, Higgins’s formal education and intellectual mindset create problems within the play. His academic language intimidates and confuses others, as it does to Eliza on the portico and to the crowd at the play’s opening, who find his phonetic writing system frightening and assume he must be a police officer who intends harm. Because of his scientific mindset, Higgins often approaches social interactions with academic detachment and a condescending superiority. For example, when Eliza initially approaches him in his laboratory, he rejects her as her as having “ no use” and reduces her to her “Lisson Grove lingo” (Act II, Page 32). He states that to meet with her would be to “waste another cylinder on it” (Act II, Page 32), reducing her to an object, not a person. After the bet is won, he immediately discards her as if she were a thing, not a human, and wields his language against her, cruelly insulting her. Despite his formal education, Higgins lacks emotional intelligence and is baffled when Eliza asserts her autonomy by leaving him, refusing to continue to serve as an object for study.

The Role of Language and Phonetics in Characterization

Shaw establishes the importance of language and phonetics in his consistent use of phonetic spelling throughout the text. Phonetics, the study of the perception and physical production of speech, encompasses concepts such as dialectical variation, intonation, and articulation to explore the ways that people hear and generate sounds. This field transcribes sounds using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) to capture them, rather than the orthography of a specific language. Although it is not clear that Higgins uses IPA in the play’s opening, his use of an unusual way of writing to take notes on the characters’ ways of speaking suggests that he is using this skill to analyze the sounds they make. This seems to look like a secret code to the others and frightens them.

Both Higgins and Pickering are presented as experts in phonetics. Their seemingly exaggerated discussion regarding who can produce the greatest variety of vowel sounds is an outgrowth of this training. Higgin’s supposed articulation of 130 of them is met by Pickering’s comment that only Higgins can hear the difference among them. Their knowledge of dialects and systematic approach to language are at the heart of their bet, as they see Eliza’s transformation as a living laboratory experiment.

Not only does Shaw use phonetic writing to imitate Eliza’s cockney accent, he also uses it to depict the speech of genteel characters, including Higgins’s pronunciation of “show” as “shew.” By replicating the characters’ pronunciation on the page, Shaw highlights the importance of precise means of speaking to his play. His plays are often described as “talky,” with heavy dialogue but most of the action happening offstage. In Pygmalion, this aspect of Shaw’s writing draws attention to the specificity of language and accents. As a playwright, he uses this precise approach to language to create and sustain the illusion of the play’s social hierarchy.

Throughout the play, language is portrayed as a powerful force capable of creating social mobility if one manipulates aspects of phonetics, word choice, and phraseology to that end. Higgins, as a Pygmalion figure, manages to sculpt a duchess through his language lessons, and Eliza reimagines her future and her identity through language. The power of language to either build or destroy self-confidence and a sense of agency are also evident in the play. Pickering’s kind words spur Eliza’s transformation, and Freddy’s letters woo her. Yet language can also be violent, as in Higgins’s use of elevated language to insult and threaten those whom he sees as inferior to him. Language has the power both to create and to destroy.

Women’s Identity, Gender Roles, and Marriage

In the Pygmalion myth, the sculptor rejects the women around him, condemning them as sexually immoral, and instead sculpts an ideal woman, ultimately falling in love with his own creation. Higgins, too, rejects the women around him, but his own creation stuns him by choosing to leave him when he refuses to treat her with respect and dignity.

Higgins’s misogynistic explanation for his bachelorhood accuses women of being “jealous, exacting, suspicious, and a damned nuisance” (Act II, Page 47). He twice uses a slur against Eliza that usually indicates a man finds a woman to be too sexually permissive, although he flings this insult at her in nonsexual situations. This echoes Pygmalion’s judgment of the women around him. Unlike Pygmalion, when Higgins creates his ideal woman, she does not act as he expects. She seeks independence and won’t tolerate Higgins’s verbal abuse. Even his proposal that the three of them continue to live together after the bet is won is predicated on a gender imbalance: Eliza would still live as if she were a servant, as suggested by Higgins’s placement of her on the payroll in Act II, or like a dog who fetches his slippers while the men do as they please. Rather than submit, she leaves. Eliza transforms not into the ideal Victorian female, but into an independent woman. Whether Higgins accepts this difference and learns to see Eliza as an equal or rejects it and demands conformity is unresolved at the play’s conclusion. However, Eliza’s transformation shows that the ideal Victorian woman is unnatural, constructed, and artificial, similar to Pygmalion’s statue. The role of the ideal upper-class woman must be studied and performed and is not an authentic way of living.

Victorian gender roles were rigid. At first glance, Mrs. Pearce and Mrs. Higgins appear to fulfill the expected gender roles for their class. Mrs. Pearce dutifully serves Higgins, and Mrs. Higgins dotes upon her son. However, these women try to assert their own agency as best they can. Mrs. Pearce advocates for Eliza, attempts to create privacy and personal space for her, and criticizes Higgins’s poor manners. Mrs. Higgins protects and supports Eliza over her own son when his behavior is harsh and cold. Eliza dramatically attempts to reject gender roles through her transformation, which is driven for her desire to be an independent working woman. She supported herself prior to meeting Higgins, and her proposal to take lessons from him was rooted not in her desire to find a husband or enter into an idle society life but in the wish to carve out a better-paying and more secure role as an employee of a flower shop. Despite her longing for autonomy and her independent nature, at the end of the play she has three options that are defined by the men in her life: live with Higgins, live with her father, or marry Freddy. Men control her future, regardless of her choice, given the constraints on her gender in the era. Without wider social reform, women cannot fully escape the constraints of Victorian womanhood.

In Shaw’s worldview, marriage is transactional. Eliza compares marriage to sex work. As a lady, she no longer sells flowers but must “sell” herself by taking on a husband (Act V, Page 100). While this blunt description offends Higgins’s sense of middle-class morality, he, too, uses financial terms in describing her. After the experiment, he describes her emotional state as “cheap” (Act V, Page 99) and suggests that sleeping and refreshing herself will make her a more profitable match than she is in her tired state. The bargain struck between Doolittle and Higgins further underscores marriage as a financial transaction and women as something to be purchased. Doolittle claims he arrives to rescue his daughter’s honor. The five-pound payoff, then, is positioned as if it were a dowry to cement a marriage. Doolittle makes the financial subtext explicit when he says he would give Higgins a “good deal” (Act II, Page 56) on Eliza. Higgins confirms this transaction when he states that Eliza “doesnt belong” to Doolittle because Higgins “paid him five pounds for her” (Act V, Page 114). Shaw presents marriage as the reduction of women to objects meant to be bought and sold.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 64 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools