logo

45 pages 1 hour read

King Hedley II

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1985

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

King

Content Warning: This section of the guide describes and discusses the source text’s treatment of racism.

King is a Black American man in his thirties. He has a long scar running down the side of his face, given to him by a man whom he ended up killing in a subsequent fight. He served seven years in prison for that murder and has just been released when the play opens. He is married to Tonya and is the son of Ruby, a former big-band singer. Because Ruby spent so many years on the road, King was raised mostly by Ruby’s aunt Louise, whom he considers to be his true mother.

King is characterized in part by the hopes and dreams he has for the future. At the beginning of the play, he plants a few seeds in a patch of ground that Ruby warns him is too bare to be fertile. Despite her words, King nurtures the seeds through the entirety of the drama. This act is a metaphor for the plans King has for his own future, which is uncertain in his crime-plagued Pittsburgh neighborhood. King, like many men in his position, has few job prospects. There are limited opportunities for Black men in his city, and his criminal record limits his options even further. He feels that the only way he can achieve his dream of owning a legitimate business is to raise the funds by illegal means. In this regard, King’s character is meant to speak to broad societal trends in 1980s Pittsburgh (and indeed other American cities) and should be read in part as social commentary on the way that institutional racism impacts Black men’s career choices.

Racism also impacted King as a young man. He recalls being singled out in school for behavior problems in a way that white boys were not. King was labeled as a troublemaker as a young child, and that stigma stuck with him through adolescence and into adulthood. Although Wilson does not use the term schools-to-prisons pipeline, King’s story illustrates the way that young Black men are often the targets of unequally enforced school discipline policies, and their status as “troublemakers” follows them through to adulthood. King sees the discrimination he faced at school, in the community, and from the police as one, unbroken chain of events and was not surprised when the police told him that he “wasn’t nothing but a sorry-ass criminal” (13).

The difficulty that King experiences as a result of systemic racism also impacts his romantic relationships. Tonya, his wife, is not happy to find out that she is pregnant with his child. She does not believe that he is capable of escaping the world of criminality and tells him: “You either gonna end up dead or in jail” (84). King loves deeply, and is shown to have adored both his deceased ex Neesi and his current wife Tonya, but because of how limited his options are, he struggles to provide the kind of life that Tonya wants.

King is also an illustration of the perils of the cycle of violence, but the most tragic aspect of his characterization is that he comes to understand the role that he plays in that cycle, but still cannot escape it. Although he is initially defiant in his descriptions of the man he killed, asserting that the murder had been in response to direct provocation and disrespect, he does come to the realization that what he thought of as a “moral code” had actually just mired him in a cycle of violence that was beyond his control. He regrets taking a father away from his son, but ultimately King falls victim to violence himself.

Tonya

Tonya is King’s wife. Like King, she is in her thirties. She is characterized primarily through her relationship with King and her daughter Natasha, but she is still a complex figure. Each of the characters in this play is characterized in part by their relationships with one another, and this is a direct reflection of the importance of family and community for this group of people. There is love between Tonya and King, but Tonya has serious reservations about King’s ability to escape both the cycle of neighborhood violence that he is caught up in and the various illicit economies in which he finds work. King does want to make the transition to legal employment, but Tonya doubts his ability to do so. She has so little faith in King that she wants to abort his child. Whereas King sees the baby as a beacon of hope, Tonya has already had the experience of raising a child in a neighborhood so devoid of resources and opportunity, and she is hesitant to try again. Speaking to King about her daughter, now a teenager, Tonya argues: “Look at Natasha. I couldn’t give her what she needed. Why I want to go back and do it all again?” (38). Tonya’s character, too, speaks to the impact of systemic racism on Pittsburgh’s Hill District. She understands how difficult it is to raise a child whom she cannot truly provide for, and does not want to see another young person grow up with “no future.”

Ruby

Ruby is King’s mother. She is in her sixties and was a big band singer in her youth. She recently moved back to Pittsburgh after many years out of state, and King has not forgiven her for leaving him with her aunt Louise as a young boy. Ruby is a complex figure defined in part by this fraught relationship with motherhood. King is not shy about his resentment and often tells her to leave him alone. She frequently snaps back, “You watch yourself. I’m still your mama” (12), but it is obvious that she is aware of the impact that her choices had on her son. She is also characterized through her relationship with Elmore. She does love him, but it is a fraught, fractured love. She does not trust Elmore because of the many times he’s abandoned her in the past, but also because he killed Leroy, King’s real father. In her ability to forgive Elmore for killing the father of her child, Ruby displays an interesting complexity. She understands the cycle of violence in her neighborhood as a force larger than the men who are caught up in it, and seems to realize that Elmore was acting out in ways that he himself did not truly grasp. In spite of the way that she understands the difficulties of the neighborhood, Ruby still wants better for her son, and repeatedly urges him to stop his criminal activity and find legal work.

Elmore

Elmore is Ruby’s longtime, on-again-off-again boyfriend. He is a professional hustler. Although often nattily dressed, his clothes are beginning to show signs of wear. His quasi down-and-out appearance speaks to his many years of life in the streets and helps to build a portrait of him as a man whose best days are behind him. He claims to be ready to settle down with Ruby, but she has never seen evidence that Elmore keeps his promises, and so she doubts him. About him, she remarks, “He play at manners, but it ain’t real” (18). And yet, Elmore does propose to Ruby and does eventually seem ready to commit to her. He is a complex character who shows signs of real growth during the course of the play. In addition to his willingness to finally make a life with Ruby, he also demonstrates self-reflection and remorse for his past crimes. He comes to realize that he is only one small piece in a cycle of violence that is much larger than he is. He sees that he has become caught up in this cycle, and that although he is in some ways a victim of it, he is also a perpetrator. Both Elmore and King, although mired in tragedy, also carry seeds of hope: They demonstrate that redemption is possible and depict a masculinity that is capable of transformation and change.

Mister

Mister and King have been best friends since grade school, and they sometimes engage in joint business ventures. Mister is polite, well-mannered, and always dressed sharply. Like King, he struggles in his romantic relationships and in finding legal work, and together the two men embody the problems of their generation. Mister, like King, recalls being the target of racism early on, while still in school. He and King remember how the stigma of being labeled a bad student followed them through their adolescence and into adulthood. He and King are driven to crime because of the lack of opportunities in their neighborhood, but their goal is to open a video store, a legitimate business, together. Mister thus embodies the same spirit of hope that King does. In the play’s final scene, Mister repeatedly goads King into engaging in retributive violence against Elmore, and he thus also embodies the difficulty of escaping the cycle of violence. His moral “code,” like King’s, leans heavily on defending one’s honor through violence. Although King has figured out that this kind of mentality is in part responsible for the difficulties that the two men experience, Mister has not quite come to that realization. Still, in the way that many of Mister’s experiences parallel Kings, he speaks to the same set of societal problems that plague King and the rest of the men in their generation.

Stool Pigeon

Stool Pigeon is King’s next door neighbor. In his sixties, he is the neighborhood “truth sayer.” He often quotes the Bible and is sure that God is about to bring his wrath down on neighborhood residents whom he feels have lost their way. Through the news he shares about Aunt Ester, he connects the events of King Hedley II with several other plays in the Pittsburgh Cycle. He is an important mouthpiece for the author’s arguments about the impact of neighborhood decline on the Hill District Community, and through his interest in religion he showcases the importance of the church within Black American culture, even during the waning decades of the 20th century.

Much of Stool Pigeon’s monologue focuses on the death of neighborhood matriarch Aunt Ester. Ester was a formerly enslaved woman who had been alive for hundreds of years at the time of her death. She appears in multiple other plays within the cycle, and is meant to embody the way that cultural knowledge and wisdom are passed down through each successive generation of Black Americans in the years following emancipation. She is also a symbol of strength, resilience, and community connection. The entire neighborhood plans to gather for her funeral, and her presence within this play is meant to signify hope and perseverance: King and others like him do submit to the cycle of violence that plagues the neighborhood, but there are many hopeful moments within the drama. There remains a spirit of connection in spite of neighborhood decline, and Stool Pigeon and Ester speak to that kind of perseverance.

Stool Pigeon also, very early in the narrative, identifies crime and general decline in the community as key concerns. He feels as though his fellow Hill District residents have, in many cases, lost their way and that their focus on tit-for-tat retribution harms everyone. He chides the men around him for being too quick to fall back on revenge as a problem-solving technique and notes, “You a gunfighter, but God’s a firefighter” (35). By this he means that the only way to approach conflict is how a Christian would, and because of this he urges those around him not to resort to violence. In addition to speaking about Aunt Ester, much of Stool Pigeon’s monologue is religious in nature, and he often quotes scripture. Here, too, he tries to help those in the community by reminding them of their religious roots and urging them toward right thought and right action.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 45 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools