logo

43 pages 1 hour read

Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 3-4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 3 Summary: “A Unified Movement”

By the late 1970s, various factions of the white power movement had started working together by staging events, such as screenings of the pro-KKK film Birth of a Nation, to provoke confrontations with left-wing demonstrators. Screenings of Birth of a Nation afforded them a chance to demonstrate to a wider audience their willingness to step up to those they regarded as communists and other “traitorous, radical, and dangerous” elements (58). Even when police or the National Guard were able to forestall violence, white power activists hoped their appearance in public as a well-armed militia would impress potential recruits and intimidate foes. Preparation for “war against communists, blacks, and other enemies” (60) helped erase distinctions between Klansmen, neo-Nazis, neo-Confederates, and other white power elements, just as the radical left was cracking under internal divisions and government infiltration. Linkages among various white power groups turned factions into a broader social movement, with networks of kinship and mutual support developing among them. To patch up their differences, they downplayed race and instead focused on communism, which was perceived as a threat to religion, marriage, and property, as well as established racial hierarchies.

A major area of focus was North Carolina, where socialist labor organizers had run afoul of the Klan. The Left had their own armed groups, although they were sorely lacking the equipment or military experience of their opponents. In November 1979, in the city of Greensboro, members of the Communist Workers Party (CWP) held a “Death to the Klan” rally, prompting local white power groups to form a caravan of cars, driving by with insults and firing shots in the air, until the two groups collided in the street. As some of the protestors reached for their handguns, a dozen Klansmen and neo-Nazis opened fire, leaving five dead and a dozen injured. News coverage of the event was brief due to the onset of the Iranian hostage crisis only days later. After the district attorney filed charges against 14 Klansmen and Nazis, the shooters claimed self-defense on the basis that their victims were communists, and therefore enemies of the nation. The all-white jury seemed receptive to this message, with the foreman reportedly calling the Klan a “patriotic organization.” Public dislike of the CWP seemed to affect the prosecutors, who failed to present evidence that the shooting was a premeditated plot to kill their members, and not just an unfortunate escalation. The CWP also did not help matters by refusing to participate in the trial in any way. The jury returned a not-guilty verdict for all defendants, which the white power movement took as an enormous triumph and impetus to further confrontations, especially after a second trial in federal court led to the same result. A third, civil trial found the killers liable only for one death, that of the only non-CWP member to be killed. For the white power movement, this was a green light to expand the war against communism, at home and abroad.

Chapter 4 Summary: “Mercenaries and Paramilitary Praxis”

Tom Posey, another Vietnam veteran who looked to the white power movement to keep the war against communists going, decided to export the war Louis Beam had imported. He founded Civilian Military Assistance (CMA), a paramilitary group that intended to fight left-wing movements in Central America, especially Nicaragua. White power activists had already sent weapons and men to defend the white-minority government of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) as well as the apartheid regime in South Africa. When they shifted their sights to Central America in the early 1980s, the CIA was already funding and directing a host of efforts to keep the Left out of power in the region. White power mercenaries, many of them Vietnam veterans, “fought in places where they believed they could redeem the defeat of the Vietnam War, this time against new communist enemies” (82). This narrative overlapped in part with the actions and rhetoric of the Reagan administration, which was vociferously anti-communist and warned that left-wing governments in Central America could pose a dire threat to national security. Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza worked directly with other US mercenaries, who trained his soldiers at the notorious School of the Americas in the Panama Canal Zone, a training center for a host of right-wing governments, militias, and death squads throughout Central America. Many of these mercenaries were in turn linked to white power activists, who plotted an invasion of Grenada that the Reagan administration did in fact undertake in 1983.

The government did halt a white power plot to invade Dominica and convicted most of its participants of violating the Neutrality Act, but in Nicaragua and El Salvador, white power activists and mainstream conservatives saw a replay of Vietnam, albeit with the possibility of victory if the soldiers were free to fight the battle. Their tactics included Vietnam-era dehumanization of the enemy, and the use of body counts as a metric of victory, often leading to attacks on civilians assumed to be communist and therefore valid targets. After a helicopter crashed in September 1984, killing two CMA mercenaries, the Reagan administration and the CIA scrambled to cover up while Congress began to investigate what would become known as the Iran-Contra scandal. The CIA dismissed the two CMA mercenaries as rogue agents, even though they had provided them with the helicopter. Public attention even boosted the CMA’s ranks after the crash, although this same publicity (which also revealed their ties to white power groups) compelled the government to rein them in. From that point forward, CMA members focused on the US-Mexico border, launching raids into Mexico and kidnapping undocumented migrants, just as the Reagan administration was passing legislation to further militarize the border. As mercenary activity wound down, it passed from collective memory, but operational experience and the reified narrative of global war would bounce back into the United States.

Chapters 3-4 Analysis

After a Minneapolis police officer murdered George Floyd over Memorial Day weekend in 2020, a wave of protests broke out in cities across America, many of them erupting into violence either directed against or instigated by local police. Before long, these confrontations doubled as showdowns between various right-wing militias, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters, and the Oathkeepers, against a wide range of leftist and anarchist groups. The parallel between these clashes and the historical examples Belew describes in a book published only two years before the George Floyd riots are quite striking. Then, as more recently, right-wing groups used these confrontations to build alliances and win support for standing up to the Left.

This strategy failed in the August 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where Klan, neo-Nazi, and neo-Confederate imagery (and an indiscriminate vehicle attack resulting in one fatality) overwhelmed any bid for mainstream support. In 2020 white power activists enjoyed considerably more success, as they once again “united against [purported] communists at the same moment that elements of the Left fractured and collapsed under the pressure of internal divisions and government infiltration” (60). In the 1980s, locals in Greensboro and elsewhere equated communism with subversion, not least because communists were overwhelmingly Black and brown. In an example of The Overlap Between Extreme and Mainstream Politics, so long as they toned down the hardest edges of their racism, even Klansmen and neo-Nazis could win respectability. Towns that were mostly white were happy to ignore or even encourage violence against those they considered outsiders or troublemakers.

In 2020, this trend repeated itself, but now social media placed each major encounter under the national spotlight. Suddenly, the extreme and the mainstream were inextricable, because to denounce one would be immediately taken as proof by one’s political opponents of support for the other. Donald Trump inflamed matters by threatening to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization (which is impossible, as only foreign organizations can receive such designations) and calling for the Proud Boys to “stand by” during one of his debates with Joe Biden, as though he were their commander. Once again, many members of the Proud Boys were veterans who had been told to fight a civilizational enemy abroad, only to endure severe trauma and murky political results. At the same time, the white power movement had migrated online, putting veterans in touch with gamers, sexually frustrated teenagers (self-described “incels”), and others with overlapping grievances against a rapidly changing society.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 43 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools