36 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Chapter 3, Brown introduces Bill Monroe’s high lonesome holler—a sound originating in the bluegrass music tradition that captures a “shared experience” of despair that lets us “immediately know we’re not the only ones in pain” (44). While this music has the potential to liberate us from pain, without “connection or collective engagement,” it remains a song of “sorrow and despair” (45). What we find today, Brown argues, is a “high lonesome and heartbroken” world inhabited by people who have self-sorted into factions based on “politics and ideology” (45). Consequently, Brown views the populace as protecting their beliefs from the sidelines, thus, paradoxically, leaving individuals more “disconnected, afraid, and lonely” (46).
Brown notes that, at best, this sorting is “unintentional and reflexive”; however, when taken to extremes, the separation can lead to “stereotyping that dehumanizes” (48). At the same time, sorting into like-minded groups has not led to a deeper feeling of connection to our neighbors; rather, it has resulted in a heightened sense of loneliness. Citing Bill Bishop’s book The Big Sort, Brown notes that less than 25% of US counties were won in a presidential landslide in 1976, whereas by 2016, 80% of US counties were won in landslide elections. Inexplicably, the number of Americans who report feeling lonely has more than doubled. To explain this finding, Brown traces the relationship between loneliness and feelings of social disconnection.
According to neuroscience researcher John Cacioppo, as a social species, we “derive strength” from “our collective ability to plan, communicate, and work together” (53). Brown posits that our collective national sorting and subsequent “unchecked loneliness” are driven by fear and the lack of an outlet to openly express emotion, offer comfort, or seek justice and accountability (55). In this vacuum, blame and rage seep in the “fault lines […of] race, gender, and class” (58). This instinct to attack also takes advantage of “our lack of tolerance for vulnerable, tough conversations” (45, 58). Speaking from ideological bunkers protects our beliefs, but it keeps us isolated, disconnected, and lonely. Moreover, when the connection that unifies is actually fear expressed as blame, what “feels like a rallying movement” becomes “more of a solidifying division” (57).
In the remainder of the book, Brown examines strategies for regaining true belonging and taking steps towards reclaiming human connection. In the face of fear, she argues that we must choose vulnerability and courage over the comfort of the status quo to “find our way back to one another” (59).
Brown introduces the high lonesome holler as an exemplar of the “transformative power of art” (44), which helps individuals to simultaneously express and relieve their pain. She argues that, because the world feels heartbroken, in our fear, we choose actions that bring in-groups closer together while keeping larger groups separated. Modern culture’s focus on divisive politics is deeply effective at ensuring that people hold tighter to their factions and stay quiet in public, all while shouting their truth from the anonymity of a physical or virtual crowd. People can and do gain a sense of belonging this way, but at the expense of increasing levels of “cynicism and distrust” (46). As a result, cross-group communication and connection have withered to the point of “collective spiritual crisis” as people feel themselves cut off from a greater spiritual power and from one another (45).
In tracing the source of this crisis, Brown cites previous research that shows how and why people are sorting themselves into preferred social settings. When people make decisions to socialize with others based on political or ideological beliefs, they find camaraderie and comfort in times of fear and uncertainty. Unfortunately, this comfort can have the unintended consequence of enabling extreme thinking while muzzling dissent. In these cases, people are allowed membership in the group as long as they keep themselves in line, but at the expense of growth. They become less free to express unorthodox opinions or ideas, less exposed to divergent perspectives and ideologies, and less tolerant of difference.
In practical terms, when individuals are driven to unite out of fear, other people, either in-group or out-group, can find themselves reduced to monoculture constructions. Brown introduces the concept of “the lonely feeling” to describe the sensation of “being with people and feeling alone” (52). While there is nothing inherently wrong in seeking out like-minded people, groups must allow members to “talk openly about […] collective grief and fear” (57). If this process is stifled, members will experience “an emotional diversion” that “becomes less of a protective barrier and more of a solidifying division” (57). This lack of tolerance is what fuels the disconnection and disempowerment individuals feel when operating from a fractured as opposed to a whole self.
To combat this separation, in the following chapters Brown posits four strategies individuals can practice to help restore the beauty and power of social connection, whereby pain and hurt are felt and shared, as opposed to inflicted and spread (59).
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Brené Brown